Discrimination, Retaliation, Wrongful Termination, and Unpaid Wages
Age discrimination
An employer’s failure to comply with the plain language of its own policy is enough to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to the true reason for firing an employee.Failure to retain other older employees, Plaintiff who was 66, another who was 60, and two other older employees, after “outsourcing,” while retaining younger employees bolsters an inference of pretext.Evidence that the hiring decisions were based on subjective considerations such as, “looking for…a candidate…to kind of complement [him]” or “felt that [the successful] applicant would be a good instruction leader for her teachers,” may be pretext for age discrimination. Employment Contracts
Who pays the attorneys’ fees? Does the “American Rule” Rule?Dangers and Pitfalls of Blindly Signing an Employment ContractA jury trial waiver is unenforceable if an employee has disproportionate bargaining power compared to his employer, has no opportunity to negotiate the provision, is not represented by counsel, and has no business experience, even though the waiver is bolded, in all-caps, underlined, and appears just above where the employee signed. Failure to hire
An employer’s proffer of its own policy is not competent in itself as evidence the policy was followed.When pleading knowledge, it is enough to plead simply that the bad actor knew and this this precipitated the bad acts.A plaintiff’s own assertions about his official job duties can plausibly establish that his actions were outside the course and scope of his job duties. Gender discrimination
Freyd v. University of Oregon: What does equal work mean under the Equal Pay Act?An employee can demonstrate pretext where other individuals that assisted with her complaint also experience an adverse employment action.decisionmaker asserting influence over other members of the deciding board with regards to terminating the employment contract of a Caucasian male only in order to replace him with an African-American female is evidence of pretext. Hostile Work Environment
The Hostile Work EnvironmentTo prove constructive discharge, Plaintiff must demonstrate a greater severity or pervasiveness of harassment than the minimum required to prove a hostile working environment.regular pattern of frequent verbal ridicule or insults sustained over time can constitute severe or pervasive harassment sufficient to violate Title VII. Immunity/Affirmative Defense
Submission of online application by Plaintiff authorizing prior employers to provide full details of past employment does not waive a mutual non-disparagement provision of a settlement agreement.Defendant’s expressions of doubt that plaintiff could perform the job duties for a prospective employer were not protected by Tex. Lab. Code § 103, which makes employers immune from suit for describing the manner in which an employee performed her job duties for that employer.Ministerial Exception is an affirmative defense, not a jurisdictional bar. Imputing Improper Motive
An employer’s proffer of its own policy is not competent in itself as evidence the policy was followed.When pleading knowledge, it is enough to plead simply that the bad actor knew and this this precipitated the bad acts.Evidence that co-employee or manager misrepresented employment test results that may have been caused by employee’s disability shows disability animus that may be imputed to company to show pretext because employer relied on that misrepresentation to terminate plaintiff. Overtime claims
Department of Labor’s New Proposed Regulations Pose a Threat to Employee RightsAn employee may defeat a Twombly motion to dismiss by pleading that he is a nonexempt employee that worked in excess of forty hours per week and was not paid one and a half times his regular rate of pay for overtime hours worked.A plaintiff may demonstrate that there is a reasonable basis for crediting the assertion that the aggrieved individuals are similarly situated for the purpose of conditional certification where one former employee files a Notice of Consent to opt in after the plaintiff files his motion for certification. Pretext
An employer’s failure to comply with the plain language of its own policy is enough to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to the true reason for firing an employee.Failure to retain other older employees, Plaintiff who was 66, another who was 60, and two other older employees, after “outsourcing,” while retaining younger employees bolsters an inference of pretext.Evidence that the hiring decisions were based on subjective considerations such as, “looking for…a candidate…to kind of complement [him]” or “felt that [the successful] applicant would be a good instruction leader for her teachers,” may be pretext for age discrimination. Race Discrimination
Section 1981 prohibits race discrimination and retaliation in contracts, including race-based interference in contracts.Alleging the underlying facts and the key players at issue is enough to sufficiently state a claim for violation of the Equal Protection Clause due to race-based termination and sexual harassment.An employer’s selective application of a facially neutral policy is evidence of pretext. Religion discrimination
An employee may provide evidence to rebut an employer’s undue hardship defense or its evidence of a neutral policy.The availability of a volunteer to cover an employee’s shift precludes an employer from asserting an undue hardship as a result.An employee’s bona fide religious belief does not require an inquiry into the nature of the activity itself. Sexual Harassment
What to do if You are the Victim of Discrimination at the WorkplaceAlleging the underlying facts and the key players at issue is enough to sufficiently state a claim for violation of the Equal Protection Clause due to race-based termination and sexual harassment.Fact issue exists over whether Defendant’s decision to end assignment of Plaintiff employed by third party based on unlawful motive satisfies employment relationship requirement of Texas employment discrimination laws.
