Photo of Kalandra N. Wheeler

We asked Kalandra N. Wheeler, a Trial Attorney in the Dallas office of Rob Wiley, P.C., to provide her sincere answers to a range of questions.  After reading, you will be more more abreast with the understanding and competency that Ms. Wheeler brings.

1. What is the most important issue to you of being an advocate?

I pride myself on doing everything possible to protect my clients' rights.  I am a believer in justice and everyday people deserve competent representation in an arena that is difficult for non-lawyers to navigate.

2. What is the most satisfying part of working for Rob Wiley, P.C.?

The people.  In an environment such as Rob Wiley, P.C. there is a great sense of teamwork and a shared desire amongst us to see each attorney achieve success in representing their clients.

3. What is the biggest mistake you see clients make?

Seeking legal advice from sources other than a qualified attorney.

4. Who is your favorite Supreme Court Justice?

Thurgood Marshall.

5. If you could write a new law, what would it do?

I would want a law that properly holds employers responsible for the actions of employees against their co-workers.  Employers should not be relieved of responsibility simply because work place injuries are covered by Workers' Compensation.

6. Besides Rob Wiley, P.C., what is the most interesting job that you have had?

For a year before law school, I worked as a lube tech for Jiffy Lube.   I was the only female employee and I enjoyed the looks on customer’s faces when they realized I wasn’t going to be working the register or vacuuming their cars and wiping windows, but instead changing their oil or flushing their transmissions or radiators.  I never had a customer come back with a complaint.

7. How do you market yourself differently than others?

I tell clients what they need to hear, not necessarily what they want to hear.

8. What personality trait do you like most about yourself?

The ability to remain even-tempered under unpredictable circumstances.

9. What is your favorite food?

Soul food!

10. What’s the best part of living in Dallas?

Dallas is a beautiful city with lots of culture.  On any given day of the week, you can find a new venture to explore,  or an event to attend, all the while be meeting new people.

Kalandra N. Wheeler is a Trial Attorney in the Dallas office of Rob Wiley, P.C.  She graduated from The University of Houston with a bachelor's degree in political science.  Ms. Wheeler went on and received her law degree from The University of Arkansas.

“[D]espite there being instances, such as in Section 12.1056(d), where an open- enrollment charter school is treated in the same manner as a school district, nothing in the Texas Education Code or the common law dictates that open-enrollment charter schools and school districts are universally equivalent.”

Section 7.057(a)(2)(B) sets forth the process by which

“[The investigator] testified that a portion of the hours she found Dow to have been overbilled was in the form of employees arriving late, leaving early, and taking breaks. (Id. at pp. 113—15). [The investigator] stated that the contract between Axion and Dow did not permit Axion to bill Dow for its employees’ breaks.

“[Plaintiff] testified that [manager] Young instructed her to refuse [the customer’s] attempted return, and that she was disciplined for doing just that. [Plaintiff] explained that [customer] requested her termination, and that [manager] Young responded “don’t you worry sir. I’m fixing to take care of her right now.” And according to [customer], his complaint to co-manager

Plaintiff’s earnings prior to her employment with Defendant are not relevant to this cause of action. Therefore, the temporal scope of the financial information relevant to Plaintiff’s case is limited to the time period during and after her employment with Defendant. Because Plaintiff was hired by Defendant in June of 2014, only Plaintiff’s earnings (and

These statements are clearly sexual in nature and are significantly less ambiguous than the “jealousy” remark that the court relied on in La Day. When the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to Salinas, a reasonable jury could conclude that Castillo’s sexually charged comments and inappropriate touching of Salinas indicate legitimate sexual

We conclude that Vallejo met his initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of age discrimination. The only evidence offered, TVC’s evidence, showed that Vallejo, age sixty, was replaced by someone who—although at fifty-one within the protected class—was “substantially younger.” See Agoh, 992 F.Supp.2d at 740. TVC did not present evidence negating these

“Although this evidence on its own likely would not support an inference of pretext, a rational juror could conclude that [Defendant’s] failure to re-hire these employees on a full-time basis further weakens the credibility of [Defendant’s] proffered rationale for not hiring [Plaintiff], thus buttressing a reasonable inference that the failure to rehire [Plaintiff] was based

“[W]e have recognized that subjective hiring criteria “ ‘provide opportunities for unlawful discrimination’ because the criteria itself may be pretext for age discrimination.” Id. at 11, citing Medina v. Ramsey Steel Co., 238 F.3d 674, 681 (5th Cir.2001) (quoting Lindsey v. Prive Corp., 987 F.2d 324, 327 (5th Cir.1993)).



Stennett v. Tupelo

“This court has held that an employer’s reliance on “previously unmentioned” job requirements can raise a “genuine issue of material fact as to pretext.” Id. at 11, citing Moss v. BMC Software, Inc., 610 F.3d 917, 926 (5th Cir.2010). Plaintiff was able to point to evidence that the “proffered reason for hiring [an] Assistant

“Although…individual principals had the ultimate power to decide whom to interview, the record nevertheless supports a finding that the individual principals conferred in deciding not to interview [Plaintiff].” Id. at 10.

“Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to [Plaintiff]…we conclude that a jury reasonably could determine that it was not a mere