“Leissner stated that McMann’s prior offenses and failure to secure the trash trailer would not justify his termination…. He also points to the deposition of Katya Watson, the regional property manager, who stated that McMann’s failure to secure the cart and prior offenses were not grounds for termination…. Accordingly, McMann has raised a genuine issue
Employment Discrimination
Company’s lack of disciplinary procedures and failure to inform an employee of subpar performance prior to termination for performance constitutes evidence of pretext.
“[Defendant] does not appear to have formal written procedures in place for handling disciplinary matters, and there is no indication that [Plaintiff] was in fact informed that her work was subpar prior to the termination of her employment…. The Court finds that there are contested issues of material fact regarding the reason for [Plaintiff]’s termination…
A supervisor’s comment to an employee not to die is evidence that the employee was regarded as disabled.
“Leissner’s alleged warning to McMann not to die in someone’s apartment, may enable a reasonable jury to find that Leissner regarded McMann as having an impairment, namely heart disease, which substantially limits him in the major life activity of working.”
McMann v. Greystar Management Services, LP, CA No. 1:12-CV-909, 2013 WL 6243847 at *5 (W.D.…
Prior congenial contact with alleged harasser is permissible if at some point the conduct becomes uninvited.
“Contravening the heavy weight of this inference is the fact that the text messages at some point changed, indicating [Plaintiff]’s strong desire that [harasser] stop contacting her. This suggests that [harasser]’s overtures were later uninvited.”
Bourgeois v. Matrana’s Produce, 2013 WL 4525652 at *6 (E.D. La. August 30, 2013) (Roby, J.).
Changed circumstances render a same actor inference inapplicable.
“[A]fter the Plaintiff was hired and before she was fired, Wade made an allegation of race discrimination. Abadilla (age 61 at the time Plaintiff was discharged) was herself implicated in the Wade situation…. [T]hese changed circumstances, primarily Wade’s allegation of race discrimination, render the ‘same actor’ inference inapplicable.”
Bautista v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc…
Employee’s testimony and a corroborating statement from another witness is enough to create a question of fact.
“McMann asserts that he resigned even though he did not want to because he felt compelled to do so…. Additionally, in a sworn statement, Gregg Williams states that Leissner told him the missing trash cart had been the reason for McMann’s termination…. The factual dispute[s] … are enough to demonstrate a genuine dispute of material…
Same actor inference does not apply unless all individuals are the same for hiring and termination.
“[B]ecause there were a number of individuals involved in the decision to terminate Plaintiff’s employment, some of whom were not involved in the decision to hire her, the ‘same actor’ inference is inapplicable.”
Bautista v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., 2013 WL 4647677 at *6 (S.D. Tex. August 30, 2013) (Atlas, J.).
An employer is not entitled to the Ellerth/Faragher affirmative defense as a matter of law where other supervisors were aware of the conduct and failed to report it in accordance with employer’s policies and procedure or where the employee is not provided any assurances as to how “no contact” with the harasser will be enforced.
“Plaintiff testified that because she was provided no assurances about how no contact with [the harasser] was going to be enforced and [the harasser] was not disciplined in any manner, she had no choice but to accept the transfer. A genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the employer exercised reasonable care to…
Along with evidence of pretext, statements after termination that an employee would be fine because she was old enough to receive Social Security and was an old lady slow to make decisions constitutes evidence of age discrimination.
“[Employee] told Plaintiff that she would be okay financially because she was old enough to receive Social Security benefits … [and] that training Plaintiff was ‘not a priority’ and that she and [Employee] were ‘old ladies’ who were ‘slow to make decisions’ … [T]he statements are evidence that, combined with other evidence discussed above, raises…
Employer giving employee the option of turning in two weeks notice or being immediately terminated is constructive discharge.
“McMann testified in his deposition that Watson told him that he had an option of turning in his two weeks notice or being terminated immediately…. The factual dispute[s] … are enough to demonstrate a genuine dispute of material fact.”
McMann v. Greystar Management Services, LP, CA No. 1:12-CV-909, 2013 WL 6243847 at *4 (W.D. Tex.…
