“Plaintiff averred that the ridicule and name calling occurred on a daily basis. She stated Anderson, specifically, ridiculed her daily, calling her a ‘crybaby’ after she became upset about being ridiculed, assigned her more tasks than the other non-Hispanic employees, and made fun of her Spanish accent. These actions, coupled with Anderson’s alleged prohibition of
“Relevant factors are ‘the frequency of the discriminatory conduct; its severity; whether it is physically threatening or humiliating, or a mere offensive utterance; and whether it unreasonably interferes with an employee’s work performance.”
Royal v. CCC & R Tres Arboles, 736 F.3d 396, 402 (5th Cir. November 21, 2013) (Jolly, J.).