“Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to [Plaintiff], the Court finds that he has presented sufficient evidence to establish a genuine dispute of material fact from which a jury could conclude that the harassment complained of was based on race. Such a conclusion is underscored by the deposition testimony of Bell’s white co-worker, who testified that he “never heard [Lane] talk to the white salespeople like the black salespeople. Definitely. He never said the same things to us that he would say to the others.”
Bell v. Lane, 2014 WL 4925682, at *7 (M.D. La. Sept. 30, 2014) (Jackson, J.); see also Postell v. Lane, 2014 WL 4925665 (M.D. La. Sept. 30, 2014); Thompson v. Lane, 2014 WL 4925622 (M.D. La. Sept. 30, 2014).