“Although Defendant suggests that the remote temporal proximity of the African American hire and Plaintiff’s termination indicate no relation between the two events, such is an inference more properly drawn by the trier of fact.  Thus, Plaintiff has established a prima facie case of disparate treatment, causing the burden to shift to Defendant to assert a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions.

Garcia v. Garland Ind. Sch. Dist., No 3:11-cv-502-N-BK, 2013 WL 5299264 at *11 (N.D. Tex Sept. 20, 2013) (Godbey, J.).