“Although the City’s complaints about the alleged shortcomings in [Plaintiff]’s analysis may go to the probative value of his testimony, based on the record as a whole we conclude that there is sufficient statistical evidence from which a jury could reasonably conclude that the Consolidation Agreement caused the disparate impact alleged.”
City of Austin v. Chandler, 2014 WL 524671 at *8 (Tex. App.—Austin, no pet. February 7, 2014) (Field, Goodwin, and Puryear, JJ.).