“Hall presented evidence that younger employees were trained to move into positions that assumed the duties of the food prep position—a position that Hall presented evidence was being phased out of RDSL’s corporate structure. Hall further presented evidence that unlike her younger counterparts, she was not trained for this new position. This evidence is the type of circumstantial evidence from which a factfinder might reasonably conclude that RDSL intended to discriminate against Hall because of her age in reaching its decision to end her employment.”

Hall v. RDSL Enterprises, LLC, 2014 WL 656843 at *6 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth, no pet.  February 20, 2014) (Gardner, Meier, and Gabriel, JJ.).