We conclude that Vallejo met his initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of age discrimination. The only evidence offered, TVC’s evidence, showed that Vallejo, age sixty, was replaced by someone who—although at fifty-one within the protected class—was “substantially younger.” See Agoh, 992 F.Supp.2d at 740. TVC did not present evidence negating these
FMLA violations
Summary judgment is not properly granted if the nonmoving party has not yet had an opportunity to conduct discovery necessary to oppose the motion.
In this case, Crawford moved for summary judgment on December 16, 2015—less than two months after the case was initiated. The Court has yet to issue a scheduling order or conduct an initial case management conference. Additionally, the parties have not yet begun discovery—on the issue presented in the motion or any other. (“The [parties]…
An employee who was misled about the availability of a promotion need not show that he or she actually applied for the promotion to establish that element of a prima facie case of a failure to promote claim
Under these alleged facts, Wade has established a prima facie case for purposes of summary judgment. The Court disagrees with Home Depot that, under these alleged circumstances, Wade was required to apply through Career Depot. Although Home Depot did have a formal application process and Wade failed to follow that process, viewing the evidence in…
Sexually explicit remarks, spanning two years, which had been reported to an employee’s immediate supervisor, raise a fact issue regarding whether the environment was objectively abusive and altered terms of employment.
“[A] repeated pattern of behavior consisting of sexual comments, humiliating jokes, insults, ridicule, and intimidation. Clark claimed she was subjected to continuous repeated sexual jokes and obscene language, most of which were directed at her” and although “it could be argued that most of the acts complained of by Clark were not objectively severe,3 the…
A jury could find that the employer’s decision to terminate an employee after the employee’s refusal to write down bible verses on a daily company wide email establishes a failure to accommodate on religious grounds.
“A reasonable juror could find that Defendant failed to accommodate Plaintiff’s request because Plaintiff was terminated thirty-two (32) hours after his refusal to include Bible quotes in the Morning Coffee[name of daily email].” Mindrup v. Goodman Networks, Inc., No. 4:14-CV-157, 2015 WL 5996362, at *8 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 14, 2015). Based upon this finding,…
Allowing employee to pay reduced rent for housing increases the employee’s regular rate of pay for computing overtime.
Thus, in certain situations, an employee’s wages may include “the reasonable cost, as determined by the Administrator, to the employer of furnishing such employee with board, lodging, or other facilities.” 29 U.S.C. § 203(m). However, such reasonable cost of lodging can only be computed when determining the employee’s regular rate of pay, such as when…
A five-year employment contract with a government entity that promises a severance of the remaining wages owed if the contract is terminated by the entity for any reason other than death or disability is enforceable where the employee has performed his obligations under the contract.
“The employment contract does not constitute a gratuitous payment of public funds to Morales. The contract clearly serves a legitimate public purpose—the employment of the District’s general manager. The benefit received in return by the District under the contract is the performance by Morales of the duties of general manager. The ‘severance’ required for early…
Expert testimony that disability caused unusual test results that were basis for termination establishes the causal connection requirement for prima facie disability discrimination case.
In view of these expert opinions that Brown’s hearing impairment caused his unusual results, and given the fact that these results undisputedly resulted (one way or the other) in his termination, the Court finds sufficient evidence of a causal nexus between Brown’s disability and termination.
Brown v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., No. 1:13-cv-00176-SA-JMV, 2015…
Unless expressly addressed in the arbitration agreement, availability of collective arbitration is determined by arbitrator.
While courts determine the validity of arbitration agreements, whether the contract forbids collective arbitration does not fall within the limited circumstances under which “courts assume that the parties intended courts, not arbitrators, to decide a particular arbitration-related matter,” because the question involves contract interpretation regarding the “kind of arbitration proceeding the parties agreed to.
…
Employer is not entitled to summary judgment when it provided an accommodation and subsequently limited or eliminated the accommodation.
“Instead of giving [Plaintiff] light duty, [Defendant] provided the grocery department an additional thirty hours to allow [Plaintiff] to schedule employees to help him…. In spite of the additional hours, when sales were slower than anticipated, [Plaintiff] was instructed to cut hours…, resulting in the department being understaffed, leaving [Plaintiff] with no help and forcing…
