Plaintiff offers testimony that he performed the duties of a mortgage loan officer working for Defendant . . . . Plaintiff provides declarations of other individuals who claim the same primary job duty. Further, Plaintiff asserts that the “same pay practice” is Defendant failing to pay loan officers compensation tied to actual hours worked, denying them overtime pay required under the FLSA. Plaintiff submits declarations identifying this “same pay practice.” The Court finds that Plaintiff has shown a sufficient factual nexus which binds the proposed class to a particular policy or practice. Stier v. Great Plains National Bank, No. 4:15-cv-519, 2016 WL 1572194 at *2 (E.D.Tex. April 19, 2016).
Stier v. Great Plains National Bank, No. 4:15-cv-519, 2016 WL 1572194 (E.D.Tex. April 19, 2016).