“[Defendant] argues that [Plaintiff]’s alleged disability was not sufficiently permanent or long-term because [Plaintiff] was cleared to return to work by her physician after only a month of leave. But [Plaintiff]’s ability to return to work does not establish that she no longer suffered from a disability.” Mercer v. Arbor E&T, LLC, CIV. A. 11-cv-3600, 2013 WL 164107, at *13 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 15, 2013).